Thermal Grizzly - KryoSheet (24x12x0,2mm) - Graphene Thermal Pads - Highest Thermal Conductivity - Alternative to High Performance Thermal Paste CPU/GPU/PS4/PS5/Xbox

Product Information

One can do at least a 3080 ti die, intel IHS, and a few Decks with a bunch left over for smaller stuff. Compared to Carbonaut pads, KryoSheet offers a significantly higher thermal conductivity as a high-end product. The graphene thermal pads of the Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet series can be used excellently as an alternative to thermal pastes from the higher performance segment.

A few years ago, Thermal Grizzly released Carbonaut which was a tiny carbon sheet with the idea it could replace paste. If the item comes direct from a manufacturer, it may be delivered in non-retail packaging, such as a plain or unprinted box or plastic bag.

I don’t think that sub-250 Watt GPUs will benefit much, or most modern CPUs for that matter, aside from recent i9 models maybe? Can somebody please explain how in God's name Honeywell's PTM 7950 or 7958 is supposed to outperform EVGA Kingpins KPx or Thermal Grizzly Kyonaut Extreme?

What matters more is how well it cools, if it's easy to apply, etc, which is exactly what I'll be looking at in this review. The 103 third parties who use cookies on this service do so for their purposes of displaying and measuring personalized ads, generating audience insights, and developing and improving products. So, not too long ago, my CPU started showing signs that the thermal paste may have dried out too much. In the case of an Intel desktop CPU (socket 115x, 1200) with a heat spreader (IHS) size of 32 x 32 mm, the KryoSheet should be selected with a size of 33 x 33 mm. This increased thermal conductivity is not only due to the choice of material, but also to the innovative manufacturing process.

It’s definitely not suitable though if you bin CPUs or you are changing coolers as it should be used only 1 time. Yes it indeed can, since it's commonly used on laptop (which are direct die always now) CPU's and various GPU's and APU chips (Steam Deck, ROG Ally, etc). This increased thermal conductivity is based not only on the choice of material, but on the innovative manufacturing process. There is no adhesive so you do need to be a bit careful when you install the sheet, but not really any more difficult than dealing with paste.

After putting the KryoSheet in place, and with those same fans running 100% on a freshly cleaned radiator, I cannot even finish a 10 minute run with the CPU clocked down to 5400MHz P-cores / 4000MHz E-cores. This makes me think that for direct die applications it might be better than a traditional paste while also having insane longevity. Overall temps are down about 16c and fan speeds about 1200rpm, mine was thermal throttling and the fan annoyed me.

I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts on the thermal difference between KRYOSHEET and a traditional paste in a GPU application. Only downside is the jsaux backplate aluminum heatsink area gets up to 63°c but thats with APU pulling a lot more power as well. So I've only seen a couple of mentions of the Cryosheet, one quick mention by Hardware Unboxed who used it in a GPU test.